Golem’s recent release has been met with widespread criticism and disappointment. The game received a critical reception of 34% on Metacritic, with only 4% of critics recommending it. User reviews on Metacritic and OpenCritic also reflect a negative sentiment, with an overwhelming dislike score. Many players have encountered numerous bugs and glitches, making the game virtually unplayable. Golem has become the worst-reviewed game of the year, and its player base has dwindled significantly.
The development of Golem was plagued with issues from the start. The game was given a relatively small budget of 15 million euros, which is insufficient for a AAA title. The developers were also given limited time to work on the game, resulting in a rushed and unfinished product. The apology letter released by the developers was found to be written by an AI software, which explains the misspelling and lack of sincerity. It is clear that the publishers and developers did not prioritize the quality and success of the game.
Former developers of Golem have shed light on the mismanagement and lack of care during the game’s development. The argument system, which was meant to be a key feature, was never finished and the final version was a disappointment. Cutscenes and basic gameplay functionalities were also broken, further contributing to the game’s poor reception.
The story surrounding the apology letter itself is a testament to the overall failure of Golem. The publishers and developers failed to write a proper apology letter, relying on AI to handle the task. This lack of attention to detail and genuine communication reflects the overall lack of care and passion put into the game.
In conclusion, The Lord of the Rings Golem is a prime example of a game that was doomed from the start. The limited budget, rushed development, and lack of proper management resulted in a broken and unsatisfactory game. The use of AI to write the apology letter further highlights the lack of sincerity and dedication from the publishers and developers. It serves as a cautionary tale for the gaming industry, emphasizing the importance of proper funding, time, and care in game development.
