Replacing CEO with AI CEO
Ensuring profits for shareholders is often projected as the reason for companies laying off people and adapting automation employing AI. This is often done in the lowest levels of an organization; however, higher levels of management remain relatively immune from such decisions. Would it make more economical sense to replace all the higher levels of the management within appropriate AI? No more yearly high salaries, higher bonuses; it would require a one-time secure investment maintenance every month. Should we be working towards an AI CEO of BP to make decisions based on the decisions of the past to maximize yearly profit or think ahead to reduce the effects of climate change and ensure long-term profitability?
AI is very difficult to hold responsible for things. Do people even know what CEOs do? Let me tell you, that’s not something you can delegate to chatGPT. Maybe, maybe eventually, but AI is nowhere close to being able to do things like having conversations with business partners, making high-level abstract decisions about the direction of the company, and hiring people who are going to have a positive impact on the organization.
AI right now can sound like a non-trustworthy human being fluent in language. The very best models can sound like a more trustworthy, smarter human, but that is such a far cry from actually solving real-world problems. While I now refuse to work for anyone, let me tell you, I would never work for a human boss again. At least an AI would make rational decisions not based on emotions or ignorance.
I never met a school district office staffed with competent people ever. AI bosses for the win. Any CEO that isn’t using machine learning is a fool. Anyone thinking AI is able to just be used on its own without human checks is also a fool. AI feedback loops get you an agent that acts like Donald Trump or Big Daddy Musk. CEOs know, dude, it will never work. Please don’t implement this.
Ditch the executives and make a democratic council that guides and assists an AI CEO that can perform multiple functions. Senior management is a relatively small part of a company’s overall payroll. You’d be much better off using AI to replace the supervisor role, the basic resource allocation, and quality control functions. They perform would be easier for AI to be trained on, and there are much bigger parts of most big companies’ payroll. Better still, if you can replace the knowledge workers, you’ll save a fortune. The people doing the work are always the most expensive part of a big company, especially the skilled ones.
The idea of an AI CEO or high-level executive is an interesting concept and could have some potential advantages, such as cost savings and potentially more objective and data-driven decision-making. However, there are many factors that make it unlikely to be a practical or desirable solution with current or near-future technology. That being said, AI can and is being used to support decision-making processes in management, providing data analysis, predictions, and recommendations that can help human leaders make more informed decisions.
While the idea of replacing CEOs with AI may seem appealing in terms of efficiency and productivity, it raises concerns about the loss of human judgment, creativity, and ethics. CEOs play a crucial role in the company’s vision, negotiations, and recruitment, which AI may struggle to replicate. Additionally, the implementation of AI CEOs may lead to job losses and a lack of compassion or reason in decision-making.
In conclusion, while AI has the potential to enhance decision-making processes and support management functions, completely replacing CEOs with AI CEOs is unlikely to be a practical or desirable solution. The unique human qualities and skills that CEOs bring to the table cannot be easily replicated by AI. Instead, AI can be used as a tool to assist and augment human decision-making, leading to more informed and efficient outcomes.
